Make money with stock investing
 

Welcome to our stock investing Archive

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Employee and Management Owned Firms

Margaret Thatcher started a world trend corporate governance and the proper
during her tenure as Prime Minister is conduct of business.Employees want to
Downing Street. It is called: maximize employment and the economic
Privatization. It consisted of the benefits attached to it - managers and
transfer of control of a state-owned shareholders wish to minimize this
enterprise to the Private Sector. This parameter and its effects on the
was done by selling the shares of the corporation. Managers wish to maximize
company. At times, the control itself was their compensation - employees and owners
maintained by the state - but the wish to minimize or moderate it, each
economic benefits emanating from the group for its own, disparate reasons.This
ownership of shares was partly sold to break in the "chain of command", this
privates. Such economic benefits are diffusive, fog like property of the newly
comprised of the dividend yield of the transformed entity lead to dysfunction,
shares plus the appreciation in their financial mismanagement, lack of clarity
value (due to the involvement of the of vision and of day to day operations,
private sector) known as capital labour unrest (when the unrealistic
gains.But the privatization process was expectations of the workforce are not
not entirely homogeneous, uniform, met).So, at the beginning, during the
transparent, or, for that matter, 1980s, the West preferred to privatize
fair.The stock of some of the enterprises state owned firms - rather than to
was sold to an individual, or group of transform them. A fast accumulating body
individuals, by a direct, negotiated of economic research demonstrated
sale. A "controlling stake" (nucleus) was unambiguously that privatization did
thus sold, ostensibly yielding to the miracles to the privatized firms. In
state a premium paid by the private certain cases, productivity shot up 6
investors for the control of the sold times. Between 60 to 80 percent of GNPs
firm.This method of privatization was in the West are private now and a
criticized as "crony capitalism". For vigorous trend to privatize what remains
some reason, a select group of of the public sector still persists.But
businessmen, all cronies of the ruling the same studies revealed a less pleasant
political elite, seemed to benefit the phenomenon: only a select group of
most. They bought the controlling stakes businessmen benefited from privatization.
at unrealistically low prices, said the The paranoid allusions of the critics of
critics. To support their thesis, they this process were completely
pointed to the huge disparity between the substantiated. Something was very
price at which the "cronies" bought the corrupted in implementation of the
shares - and the price at which they, seemingly wholesome idea of
later, sold it to the public through the privatization. The public - as a whole -
stock exchange. The "cronies" cried foul: economically suffered.This led to the
the difference in the prices was emergence of a new social consciousness.
precisely because of privatization, It was provoked by the unacceptable
better management and financial control. social costs of capitalism: more people
Maybe. But the recurrence of the same under the poverty line, homelessness, a
names in every major privatization deal radicalization in the inequity of the
still looked suspiciously odd.Then there distribution of income among different
was the second version: selling the strata of society. But this trend was
shares of the privatized firms directly enhanced by the apparent corruption of
to the public. This was done using either the privatization process.This new social
of two methods:An offering of the shares consciousness converged with yet another
in the stock exchange (a cash method), all important and all pervasive trend:
orThe distribution of vouchers the formation of small businesses by
universally, to all the adult citizens of small time entrepreneurs. The latter
the country, so that they could all share functioned both as owners and as
the wealth accumulated by the state in an employees in their firms. There were 16
equitable manner. The vouchers are million such owners-workers in the USA
convertible to baskets of shares in a alone (1995 figures). About 99% of the 22
prescribed list of state enterprises (a million registered businesses in the USA
nonchash method).But a smaller group of were small businesses. No economic
(smaller) countries selected a whole planner or politician could ignore these
different way of privatizing. They chose figures. Employee owned firms became the
to TRANSFORM the state-owned firm instead majority in the service and advanced
of subjecting them to outright technology sectors of the economy - the
privatization.Transformation - the venue fastest growing, most lucrative
adopted by Macedonia - is the transfer of sectors.In its own way, as a result of
the control of a firm and / or the these two trends, the West was moving
economic benefits accruing to its back to transformation and away from
shareholders to groups which were privatization, away from separation of
previously - or still are - connected to ownership and labour, away from
the firm.In this single respect, differentiation between capital and
transformation constitutes a major workforce. This is a major revolution.The
departure - not to say deviation - from OECD (the organization of the richer
classical privatization.Ownership of the countries in the world) established an
transformed firm can revert to either of institute which follows trends in the
the following groups, or to a combination poorer parts of the world, politely
thereof:The employees of the firm, called "Economies in Transition". This is
through a process called Employee BuyOut the CCET.According to the CCET's latest
(EBO)The management of the firm, in the report, privatization continues in an
form of a Management BuyOut or Buy In uneven pace throughout the former Eastern
(MBO / MBI)A select group from within the Bloc. Some countries nearly completed it.
firm. Such a group uses the assets - Others have claimed to have completed it
current and future - of the firm as - but haven't even started it in reality.
collaterals, thus enabling them to get Some countries - Macedonia amongst them -
the credits necessary to purchase the have sold the shares of state owned firms
shares of the firm. This is called a (=businesses with social capital) to
Leveraged BuyOut, because the assets of managers and workers - but the managers
the firm itself are leveraged in order to and workers have largely not paid for
purchase it (LBO).Finally, the creditors these shares yet. It is by no means
of the firm can team up and agree to certain that they will. If the managers
convert the firm's debts to them into and workers default on their obligations
equity in the firm, in a Debt to Equity to pay the state - the ownership of the
Swap (DES).Sometimes, the state continues company will revert back to the state.
to maintain an interest in privatized - This is paper privatization, a
as well as in transformed - firms. This transformation of expectations. No one
is especially true for natural can seriously claim that the
monopolies, utilities, infrastructure and transformation is completed before the
defence industries. All the above are new owners of the firms respect their
considered to be strategic matters of financial obligations to the state.In
national interest. Some countries - all, privatization the world over,
Russia and Israel, for ones - continue to proceeded more rapidly with small firms.
own a "Golden Share". This highly Selling the bigger firms was much more
specific type of security allows the difficult. Most of this behemoths were
state to exercise decision making powers, composed of numerous profit centres and
veto powers, or, at least, control over loss making business activities. A
business matters that it considers vital solidarity of accounts and guarantees
to its security, financial viability, or existed between the various operations.
even to its traditions. Israel's golden The more profitable parts of a company
share in the national air carrier, EI AI, supported and subsidized the less
allows it to prevent flights in and out competent, the losing parts. This was not
during the religiously holy day of very attractive to investors.The official
Sabbath!Until very recently the common figures are heart warming. In parentheses
(economic) wisdom in the West had it that - the percentage of firms
Transformation was - in the best case - a privatized:Albania , Czech Republic ,
sterile, make - believe exercise. The Estonia , Hungary , Lithuania, Poland and
worst case included cronyism and Slovakia all privatized 90% of their
corruption. One thing was to privatize small firms. In Russia and Latvia, the
and another was to privateer. But there figure is 70%.The picture is more clouded
were some grounds for some solid with the larger firms:Czech Republic
criticisms as well:(1) The main (81%), Hungary, Estonia (75%), Lithuania
ideological thrust behind privatization (57%), Russia (55%), Latvia and Slovakia
was the revitalization of stale and (46%), Mongolia (41%), Poland (32%),
degenerated state firm. Badly managed, Moldavia (27%), Romania (13%), Belarus
wrongly financially controlled, applying and Bulgaria (11%), Georgia (2%).But what
an incoherent admixture of business and hides behind the figures?The Czech
non business (political, social, Republic is infamous for its cronyism and
geopolitical) considerations to their for the massive transfer of wealth to the
decision making process - state firm were hands of a few people close to government
considered as anachronistic as dinosaurs. circles.On the face of it, the situation
Many preferred to see them as extinct as in Poland looks a bit better: a universal
those ancient reptiles. An injection of voucher system was instituted. People
private initiative acquired the status of were allowed to deposit their shares with
ideological panacea to the corporate 14 management funds. These funds also
malaise of the public sector.But this is bought some of the shares, making them
precisely what was missing in the part owners. They control now 500
Transformation version. It offered enterprises, which make up 5% of the
nothing new: no new management, no new country's GNP.Some of these funds are 50%
ideas (were likely to come from the same foreign owned, so their management and
old team) and, above all and as a direct moral standards are Western. But, even
result of this preference of old over new there, rumours abound and not only
- no new capital.To this, the supporters rumours.So, what is better -
of Transformation answer that the one privatization or transformation?Maybe the
thing which is new - personal lesson is that we are all human. There is
capitalistic incentives - far outweighs no method immune to human fallacies and
all the old elements. Incentive driven desires, to corruption or to allegations
initiative is likely to bring in its wake of it. Transformation tends to benefit
and to herald the transformation - in the more people - so, maybe it looks more
most complete and realistic sense - of just. But long term it is inefficient and
the state firm.Change, renovation and leads to the ruining of the firms
innovation - say the latter - are involved and to permanent damage both to
immediate by products of personal profit the economy and to the workers-owners. Is
motivation, the most powerful known to it better to be the owner of a bankrupt
Mankind.(2) The process of Transformation firm - or to work in a functioning firm,
blurred the distinction between labour, where you have no ownership stake? This
management and ownership. Employees acted is not an ideological or a philosophical
as potential managers and as co-owners in question. Ask the employees of the
the newly transformed companies. The very Pelagonija Construction
concept of hierarchy, clear chains of Group.Privatization, on the other hand,
authority (going down) and of is much more open to manipulation - but
responsibility (going up) - was violated. at least it secures the continued
A ship must have one captain lest it existence of the firms and the continuous
sinks. It is not in vain that the employment of the workers.Sometimes, in
management function was separated from economic reality, we have to give up
the ownership function. Employees, justice (or the appearance of it) - in
managers and owners, all have differing order to secure the very survival of the
views and differences of opinion workers involved.I, personally, prefer
concerning every possible aspect of privatization over transformation.




www.atlthnl.com keyword stats [2007-04-29-2007-04-29]


Other search phrases:

best buy employee stock purchase waters corporation has a stock price of
best mutual fund to buy best day to buy stock
wii in stock store buying nintendo wii in stock
stocks you can buy directly financial planning and investment
financial investment guide stock investment tips
money investment tips how to buy stock shares
announces stock buyback great stock to buy
companies to buy stock how to sell stock certificates
small business financial advice stock market investing
how to buy penny stock employee stock purchase
best tech stocks to buy to buy shares online
audit and accounting guide investment buy stock cheap
nintendo wii in stock online store





1- A- B- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49- 50- 51- 52-